no-legal-advice.com no-legal-advice.com
An open platform for legal experiments

Front page

This is
no-legal-advice.

Simulate the process. Keep the record.

no-legal-advice.com is an open platform for experiments in how law is done. Each experiment is built in the open, run on real infrastructure, and published with its record.

Figure 1 · Ceremony cer_qjjrOYAz0jwMLedger entry 14
1 · PreparedOrganiser places 5 fields, sends17 Oct 2026, 14:52
2 · KeyEight digits by email, one party at a timetries limited
3 · SignedParty 1, then Party 2, each in turncertificate per party
4 · SealedPAdES seal, DigiCert timestampsha256 14b9dddd
5 · On the recordProof, audit log, public ledgerprf_U5dsldJvz3Pt
Stored encrypted under its own keyAnyone can verify at sign.wippli.ai/verify

Experiment 01 · Ceremonies

A signature that a stranger can check.

Each ceremony issues a short-lived certificate to every signatory, seals the document to the PAdES standard with an independent timestamp, writes an audit log of who opened and who signed, and enters the result in a public ledger. A key by email, in turn; no account, no app, no password.

  • Wippli SignCertified document signature for teams who sign often; organiser and up to four parties.
  • Sign PlannerPay per document, no subscription. You organise, they sign. US$9.99 a document.
  • PermissionAn agent asks, a person approves. The approval returns as a proof the asking service can verify.
Figure 2 · What holds it uppolicy 0.1
  • Issued per ceremony: a certificate per signatory, an attestation of what each filled in, a seal over the PDF and the audit log, a signed proof envelope.
  • Independent of us: time from DigiCert, free verification at sign.wippli.ai/verify, a public hash-chained ledger, storage encrypted per document.

Experiment 02 · Simulations

A civil dispute, run end to end, by agents.

A statement of claim, a defence, an evidence bundle and a hearing. The judicial officer, the registrar, counsel and the parties are AI agents. The hearing produces directions, findings and a determination, so the process itself can be studied, tested and improved.

  • IntakeCase overview, pleadings, evidence and precedent assembled into a hearing intake pack.
  • HearingAllocation to a bench, opening, examination of the evidence, submissions, determination.
  • AssessmentEvery hearing is scored against a rubric and fed back into the next build.
Figure 3 · Bench layoutevery seat an agent
Judicial officerPresides, directs, determines
RegistrarAllocation and the record
PlaintiffStatement of claim
EvidenceBundle, exhibits, witnesses
DefendantDefence
Counsel, plaintiffSubmissions
Counsel, defendantSubmissions
GalleryYou watch, you score, nothing binds anyone

Experiments 03 onward · Open

The platform is open. Bring the next one.

The two experiments share one method: name the process, build it on real infrastructure, run it with real people or agents, publish the record, and say plainly what is real and what is not. Anything in law that can be rehearsed, measured or verified is a candidate.

  • You bringA process worth studying, its documents, and the people or agents who play the parts.
  • We bringTasks, boards, agents, signing ceremonies, sealed records and the audit trail.
  • We publishThe record, the rubric and the results, under the same terms as everything here.
Figure 4 · The docketopen
01 · Signing ceremonieslive
02 · Trial simulationslive
03 · Agent permissions in a regulated workflowproposed
04 · Contract review, two counsels, one recordproposed
05 · Your experimentopen

Editorial

Real seals. Synthetic courts.

The platform is honest about which is which. A ceremony produces a document with legal weight wherever an electronic signature is accepted. A simulation produces nothing that binds anyone, and that is the point of it. Every experiment carries the same line on its front page.

Figure 5 · From the Terms of Use3 August 2026

Ceremonies · what is real

  • The seal and the timestamp are real and verifiable by anyone
  • The seal rests on the Wippli Sign root, not on a public certificate authority
  • Identity means holding the emailed key; a document and selfie check is not yet a step
  • Keys are eight digits, tries are limited, and documents are encrypted at rest

Simulations · what is not

  • The court is not a court; the officers and parties are AI agents, not people
  • No determination, order or direction produced here is enforceable
  • Nothing here is legal advice, and no participant is your lawyer
  • Do not upload private, confidential or privileged material; treat anything uploaded as readable by others

Practical applications

Where a rehearsed process and a sealed record earn their keep.

01

Negotiations

Run the negotiation as a simulation first, with agents playing each side, then sign the outcome as a ceremony. The record shows what was offered, what was agreed and when.

Simulation, then ceremony
02

Insurance claims

Claimant, assessor and insurer each sign their part in turn. The audit log shows who saw what and when; the sealed file is the version everyone holds.

Ceremony, sequential
03

Legal strategy

Test a line of argument against an AI bench before a real one hears it. Score the hearing, change the strategy, run it again.

Simulation, scored
04

Arbitration

A private tribunal rehearsed end to end: pleadings, evidence, submissions, award. Nothing produced binds anyone; the method can be measured before it is relied on.

Simulation
05

Multi-stakeholder signatures

One organiser, up to four parties, in the order you set. Each party's own certificate and attestation sit inside one proof, checked by anyone without an account.

Ceremony, organiser-led
06

Agent permissions

An AI agent asks for a specific action for a set time; a named person approves it by signing. The approval travels as claims inside a verifiable proof, and the asking service decides what it allows.

Ceremony as a permission

An invitation

Configurable simulations and certified ceremonies, for every industry.

Insurance, construction, health, finance, education, public bodies: wherever a process has to be rehearsed before it is trusted, or a signature has to be checked by a stranger, we can set one up on this platform. The experiments above are the first; the method travels.

Contact us admin@no-legal-advice.com

Tell us the process, the parties and what the record must prove. We answer with a proposal and a first run.

A ceremony, simulatedPreparing
Service agreement
Party 1 · signature
Party 2 · signature
Key emailed · 8 digitsKey emailed · 8 digits
  1. 01Organiser places the fields and sendsOrganiser
  2. 02An eight-digit key goes to Party 1 by emailWippli Sign
  3. 03Party 1 opens with the key and signsParty 1
  4. 04A key goes to Party 2; the organiser is toldWippli Sign
  5. 05Party 2 sees the first signature and signsParty 2
  6. 06Sealed with a certificate and an independent timestampWippli Sign
  7. 07Copies and audit log to everyone; proof on the public ledgerOn the record

Built on Wippli Signal

The engine under the experiments is decision intelligence.

Wippli Signal pulls the material, structures it into a living ontology, predicts with explicit confidence, acts through approved missions and learns from what resolved. Every experiment here inherits that loop, and every step of it is on the record.

Figure 5 · The Signal loopPull · Predict · Act · Learn · repeat
01 Pull items

Evidence that is structured, not piled

Pleadings, exhibits and precedents become linked items in one ontology per tenant, so a hearing or a negotiation starts from a map, not a folder.

Here: the hearing intake pack
02 Predict augurs

Forecasts with their confidence shown

Augurs state what is likely, how sure the model is and why. A simulation can be scored against them; a strategy can be changed before it is tried.

Here: the hearing rubric
03 Act missions

Actions that need a named approval

A mission proposes the step; a person approves it through a signing ceremony; the proof carries the claims. Agents move only on a signature.

Here: the permission ceremony
04 Learn resolve

Every outcome feeds the next run

Resolved predictions, scored hearings and sealed records go back into the ontology. The platform gets sharper with each experiment, tenant by tenant.

Here: the next build of the simulation
Tenant-scoped · explainable · on the recordWippli Signal

this is

no-legal-advice